In August 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) introduced extensive updates to its policy manual, reflecting a stricter approach to both ideological and character evaluations for nearly all immigration benefits, including green cards, visas, and naturalization.

Ideological Evaluation for Anti-Americanism

USCIS now explicitly considers any evidence of “anti-American” beliefs, anti-Semitic views, or affiliations with extremist or terrorist groups as highly negative factors in discretionary decisions. Officers are instructed to assess whether applicants have “endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise defended” such views, with expanded social media monitoring to identify potential warning signs.

It is worth noting that, while traditional law disqualifies affiliations that promote violent overthrow or totalitarianism, this broader and undefined “anti-Americanism” standard introduces a new level of uncertainty in immigration assessments.

Comprehensive Evaluation of “Good Moral Character”

At the same time, USCIS has expanded how it evaluates applicants’ “good moral character.” No longer based solely on a clean criminal record, the new guidance takes a comprehensive approach: applicants must now demonstrate positive contributions, such as community involvement, care for family members, employment, educational achievements, tax compliance, and long-term ties to U.S. society.

However, this broader approach also introduces subjective elements: minor legal infractions (e.g., traffic fines or persistent panhandling) can harm applicants, even if technically lawful. Immigration experts warn that these subjective standards could disproportionately affect low-income or less-educated applicants and lead to inconsistent decisions. According to USCIS, “good moral character” now requires evidence of positive attributes—not just the absence of wrongdoing.

What USCIS “Good Moral Character” and “Anti-Americanism” Requirements Mean for Applicants

These policy changes signal a shift toward more discretionary and ideologically influenced immigration decisions. Applicants should carefully review their social media, remove ambiguous content, and seek legal guidance to navigate subjective evaluations. At the same time, building a portfolio of positive behaviors—community service, stable employment, and civic engagement—may be essential for successfully obtaining naturalization or other immigration benefits. In this new context, USCIS’s “good moral character” and “anti-Americanism” standards have become key factors that can determine the approval or denial of an application.

Erika Rodriguez

Founder of the Immigration Law Office Abogado de Inmigración en San Diego. Erika Rodriguez has spent her career dedicated to helping individuals, families, professionals, businesses and investors in all aspects of Immigration Law.